🎉 [Gate 30 Million Milestone] Share Your Gate Moment & Win Exclusive Gifts!
Gate has surpassed 30M users worldwide — not just a number, but a journey we've built together.
Remember the thrill of opening your first account, or the Gate merch that’s been part of your daily life?
📸 Join the #MyGateMoment# campaign!
Share your story on Gate Square, and embrace the next 30 million together!
✅ How to Participate:
1️⃣ Post a photo or video with Gate elements
2️⃣ Add #MyGateMoment# and share your story, wishes, or thoughts
3️⃣ Share your post on Twitter (X) — top 10 views will get extra rewards!
👉
XRP continues to big pump! SEC's appeal details exposed, attempting to overturn Ripple's ruling
The legal dispute between the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and Ripple Labs has escalated further, and is currently undergoing proceedings in the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. The focus of this case is whether Ripple has violated the Securities Act of 1933 and whether the sale of XRP tokens should be considered unregistered securities transactions.
Background: Ripple's legal battle with the SEC is not over yet.
The SEC has accused Ripple and its top executives, Bradley Garlinghouse and Christian Larsen, of issuing and selling XRP tokens worth over $2 billion without registration, allegedly violating the 1933 Securities Act. According to the SEC, these XRP sales include institutional sales, retail transactions, and non-cash transactions (such as exchanging XRP for labor or services). The SEC believes that all of these transactions should be considered as securities activities.
The previous court ruling on the dispute: defining the boundary between institutional and retail sales
The district court has made two key rulings on Ripple's sales practices:
•Institutional sales: The court ruled that Ripple's institutional sales constituted an investment contract, supporting the SEC's claim. This means that Ripple's large-scale institutional sales are considered securities transactions and should be subject to relevant regulations.
• Retail sales and non-cash transactions: However, the court held that Ripple's retail sales through exchanges and non-cash transactions involving labor or services do not constitute securities transactions. Its main reason is that retail investors did not expect Ripple's efforts to bring them profits sufficiently.
SEC's argument on appeal: the issue of retail investors' expectations
The SEC has challenged the District Court's ruling on retail sales and non-cash transactions, and has raised the following key arguments:
• Expected Returns: The SEC believes that the court wrongly distinguished between institutional and retail investors' expectations. The SEC pointed out that Ripple had extensively promoted the correlation between its success and the price of XRP, creating expectations of returns for all types of investors, regardless of the trading type or whether investors understood the specific details of these efforts.
• Whether non-cash transactions satisfy the Howey test: The SEC stated that Ripple's non-cash transactions (such as exchanging services or labor for XRP) meet the 'investment of money' prong of the Howey test and should be considered investment contracts.
The core issue in the appeal: Definition of the investment contract
The appeal hearing in this case will focus on the following two key legal issues:
Retail investors' return expectations: Is it reasonable for retail investors of Ripple to expect the XRP they purchased to appreciate due to Ripple's efforts?
The nature of non-cash transactions: Should the XRP distributed by Ripple in non-cash transactions be classified as investment contracts?
The outcome of these issues will have a far-reaching impact on the future regulatory framework of the cryptocurrency market.
SEC's appeal: Overturning part of the district court's ruling
The SEC hopes to overturn the lower court's ruling on retail sales and non-cash transactions, arguing that Ripple's activities are like institutional sales and should be considered a violation of securities laws. The SEC's ultimate goal is to ensure that all types of cryptocurrency transactions, including XRP, are subject to securities law.
Case impact: A critical moment for the cryptocurrency market
The outcome of this case may not only be about the showdown between Ripple and SEC, but also set an important precedent for the legal status of cryptocurrencies. If the SEC succeeds in the appeal, it may further strengthen the regulation of the cryptocurrency market; but if Ripple wins partial victory again, it will provide more legal maneuvering space for the crypto industry.
This article XRP continues to soar! The content of SEC's appeal is exposed, attempting to overturn the Ripple verdict. It was first seen on Chain News ABMedia.